This professional is a professor in offshore renewable energy engineering. They have completed many research papers with more than 60 international peer-reviewed papers, and four...
This Expert was a part of the team that launched the world's first floating offshore wind project. They developed the floating offshore wind business unit...
They hold 30 years of technical, commercial and project management experience in their career. With a wide-ranging knowledge and experience across Floating Offshore Wind, Subsea,...
This expert holds a background in asset management and 6 years in the offshore wind industry. They have in-depth knowledge and understanding of offshore renewables...
This experienced expert has over 30 years of direct involvement in the international energy sector. They have developed methods for helping lift turbines onto spar...
This market-embedded expert has more than a decade of experience working in the offshore wind sector on floating and fixed offshore wind projects. They started...
30 years ago developers started the rise of the offshore wind market. More recently, however, the market has taken a more ambitious direction: putting turbines on floating platforms in the water. With this floating offshore wind market nearing commercial maturity, floating wind holds the potential to become one of the most important new renewable energy markets on the planet.
We spoke with a couple of our top floating offshore wind experts to get their in-depth analysis and opinions on some of the major questions in the industry. Dive into what they had to say below.
Floating Systems and Facilities Engineer: There are several hurdles to jump, but the top challenges as I see are:
Offshore Renewable Energy Engineer: Floating wind is the latest evolution of wind energy, and there is only a handful of floating offshore wind farms with multiple units, the main ones being:
Therefore, I would say the main challenge is a low maturity and little experience – but it is catching up quite fast.
Technically, the harsher metocean conditions found in the deeper waters, further from shore sites suitable for floating wind makes the design and operation & maintenance more challenging.
At a higher level, the industry is pushing for a convergence of designs to establish a supply chain able to deliver the hundred/thousands of units needed to fulfil the UK 1GW = 1000MW floating wind turbines target by 2030.
Offshore Renewable Energy Engineer: Floating wind is more economically viable for water depths exceeding, roughly speaking, 50m – and it is estimated that worldwide, a large percentage of the offshore wind resources are located in these water depths. Some countries, like Japan, west coast of the USA, are not as lucky as England in having a large shallow area, and floating wind will be one of the only technological offshore wind solutions available.
In these sites, the wind velocity tends to be higher (the power goes with the cube of the wind speed!), and more consistent, leading already to record performance of the installed floating wind turbines: the Hywind Scotland Pilot Park has one of the highest capacity factors among all the offshore wind farms out there (fixed to the bottom and floating).
Furthermore, floating wind turbines have the potential to be assembled quay-side, turbine and support structure, which would avoid the need for very expensive and scarcely available specialised installation vessels used for fixed wind turbines. Indeed, for fixed-to-seabed wind turbines, it is necessary first to install the support structure, i.e. the monopile “hammered” in the seabed, and then at a later stage install the wind turbine on top of the monopile. For floating, the wind turbine can be installed on the floating support structure quayside, and then used the floating support structure itself as a “transport vessel”, using relatively inexpensive and available ocean tugs (N.B. This is not true for some floating wind configurations, such as the Hywind SPAR).
Floating Systems and Facilities Engineer: Today FOW is clearly more expensive than fixed wind and has not been developed on a commercial scale. Cost reductions in FOW are forecast to bring it in line with fixed wind. FOW may eventually achieve lower LCOE since the finite number of locations for fixed wind may limit further economies of scale.
Offshore Renewable Energy Engineer: As every very young technology (the first operational floating wind farm is only 4 years old!), the levelised cost of energy is still higher than fixed offshore wind and onshore wind. On the other hand, the margins for improvement, for the same reason, are quite large, with a lot to be improved and learned – as explained in the report “FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND: COST REDUCTION PATHWAYS TO SUBSIDY FREE” by the Floating Wind Centre of Excellence, hosted by Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult.
In the “Deliverable 2.8 Expected LCOE for floating wind turbines 10MW+ for 50m+ water depth” of the EU project Lifes50+ there is a nice graph comparing the levelised cost of energy for onshore VS offshore fixed VS offshore floating, showing how floating wind is expected to reach the same levelised cost of energy within the next decades.
Floating Systems and Facilities Engineer: The Venn diagram of opportunity overlaps for locations where:
That said, there is an immediate need to reduce the carbon footprint of offshore oil & gas platforms which currently use gas turbine power generation. The energy firms operating these facilities are also making big investments into renewables, including FOW. Nearly all have been studying how to replace the old gas turbines with FOW and other alternatives.
Offshore Renewable Energy Engineer: The UK government alone has planned for 1GW (1000MW, and considering that an average MW per turbine from now until 2030 could be around 15MW, this would mean ~70 wind turbines) of floating offshore wind turbines by 2030, but countries like Japan and the USA, do need to go directly to floating with little bottom-fixed wind turbines. We will see, on one side, the industry converging on some standard designs (SPAR for deep waters, semisub for shallower waters), and on the other side the emergence of novel designs, such as the Tetraspar or Hexafloat, focusing more on ease of manufacturing.
Floating Systems and Facilities Engineer: There are more than 70 competing concepts, but they all fall into a few broad categories:
There are a few variations, such as turret & swivel mooring as opposed to simple spread mooring.
Offshore Renewable Energy Engineer: There are three main types:
Working on the same stability principle as the semisubmersible, the barge by IDEOL exploit an internal moonpool to dampen the wave-induced motions, and in terms of other notable configurations, we must cite Tetraspar and Hexafloat, exploiting the same principle of the SPAR (i.e. low centre of gravity), but having in mind a mass-production design.
Floating Systems and Facilities Engineer: This will represent a sizeable increase in infrastructure investment over the coming decades. It will alleviate the effects of the downturn in the offshore oil & gas sector which has opened up capacity that can be taken up by FOW. It will also create new growth in the supply chain and may challenge the resource base. There will be benefits across many more sectors. As capacity grows, so will the need for energy storage solutions. Availability of electricity will enable transition away from gas heating in homes, which in turn will spark the home heating sector into a new phase of activity.